MARKET UPDATE: WARNING! DO NOT FEED (YOURSELF TO)THE BEARS
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
THIS SERIES REVIEWS THE BEST HIGH DIVIDEND STOCKS THAT ALSO PROVIDE A HEDGE AGAINST THE U.S. DOLLAR
HIGH YIELD STOCKS ARE A FORM OF CASH. THUS INFLATION EATS AWAY AT BOTH YIELD AND PRINCIPLE. AS GOVERNMENTS INFLATE THEIR MONEY SUPPLY TO EASE CREDIT, MOST OBSERVERS BELIEVE INFLATION IS INEVITABLE.
SO FAR, WE HAVE EXPLORED:
THE CURRENT STATE OF THE MARKET
RECOMMENDED CRITERIA FOR SELECTING HIGH DIVIDEND STOCKS THAT ALSO GIVE A HEDGE AGAINST THE U.S. DOLLAR’S LIKELY IMPENDING DEPRECIATION.
SPECIFIC STOCK MARKET HEDGES AND SOME OF THE BEST INTERNATIONAL HIGH DIVIDEND U.S. DOLLAR HEDGE STOCKS INCLUDING:
GENERAL MARKET HEDGES
UltraShort S & P 500 Proshares (SDS), UltraShort Financials ProShares (SKF), UltraShort QQQ ProShares (QID), UltraShort Real Estate ProShares (SRS), UltraShort Russell2000 ProShares (TWM)
INTERNATIONAL
Big Oil
BP, plc (BP), CNOOC Ltd. (CEO), Enid SpA (E), Total Fina Elf (TOT)
Utilities
Veolia Environmental SA (VE), ENEL-SOCIETA PER AZI (ESOCF.PK or ENLAY.PK)
Communications
Cellcom Israel Ltd. (CEL), France Telecom (FTE) Telefonica (TEF)
HERE IN PART 6A WE LOOK AT:
Shipping
Diana Shipping (DSX), Nordic American Tanker (NAT), Paragon Shipping (PRGN) , Seaspan Corp (SSW)
IN COMING INSTALLMENTS WE’LL LOOK IN DETAIL AT:
Canadian Oil/Gas Energy Income Trusts
Advantage Energy Income Fund (AAV, TSX: AVN.UN), Enerplus Resources Fund (ERF), Peyto Energy Trust (OTC: PEYUF, TSX: PEY.UN), Provident Energy Trust (PVX, TSX: PVE.UN), Vermillion Energy Trust (OTC: VETMF, TSX: VET.UN)
Canadian Clean Energy Income Trusts
Energy Savings Income Fund (OTC: ESIUF, TSX: SIF.UN), Innergex Power Income Fund (OTC: INRGF, TSX: IEF.UN), Macquarie Power & Infrastructure (OTC: MCQPF, TSX: MPT.UN), Great Lakes Hydro Income Fund (OTC: GLHIF, TSX: GLH.UN)
Canadian Energy Infrastructure Income Funds
Altagas Income Trust (OTC: ATGFF, TSX: ALA.UN), Pembina Pipeline Fund (OTC: PMBIF, TSX: PIF.UN)
Canadian Utility Income Trusts
Atlantic Power Corporation (OTC: ATPWF, TSX: ATP.UN) and some very positive clarification from their CFO Mr. Patrick Welch, Bell Aliant (OTC: BLIAF, TSX: BA.UN)
Canadian Health Care Income Trust
CML Healthcare Inc. Fund (OTC: CMHIF, TSX: CLC.UN)
Canadian Real Estate Income Trusts
Canadian Apartment Properties REIT (OTC: CDPYF, TSX: CAR.UN), Northern Property REIT (OTC: NPRUF, TSX: NPR.UN), RIOCAN REIT: (OTC: RIOCF, TSX: REI.UN
Canadian Misc Business Trusts
Yellow Pages Income Fund (OTC: YLWPF, TSX: YLO.UN)
UNITED STATES
Communications
AT &T Inc (T), Verizon (VZ), Otelco (OTT), Windstream Corp (WIN)
Energy Infrastructure Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs)
Buckeye Partners (BPL), El Paso Pipeline Partners (EPB), Enterprise Products Partners (EPD), Energy Transfer Partners (ETP), Kinder Morgan Energy Partners (KMP), Magellan Midstream Partners (MMP), Nustar Energy (NS), ONEOK Partners (OKS), Sunoco Logistics Partners (SXL), TEPPCO Partners (TPP), Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Partners (TYG)
Coal MLPs
Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP), Northern Resource Partners (NRP), Penn Virginia Resources Partners (PVR)
Other MLPs
Terra Nitrogen Company, L.P. (TNH), StoneMor Partners (STON)
Utilities
Dominion Resources Inc. (D), Duke Energy Corp (DUK), Progress Energy (PGN), Southern Company (SO)
2. MARKET STATUS – SPECIAL REPORT
Before ever considering investing in stocks, we must always first look at the overall market, since almost all stocks follow the major indices.
Given the recent bounce, declarations that “the bottom is in” are echoing from Washington and Wall Street.
Because avoiding bad investments is even more important than finding good ones,
I present arguments that further downside is more likely.
In order to allow enough room for a full discussion, I’ve broken Part 6 into two parts. Part 6A focuses exclusively on the market, Part 6B on shipping stocks.
I draw heavily from Dr. Nuriel Roubini, perhaps the most prominent seer of the current crash and its still unfolding ramifications for the past number of years.
Debate over whether the markets have bottomed focus around the following issues.
A. The Rate of Economic Decline
The optimists say that the world wide rate of economic decline is slowing, suggesting bottoming in late 09. The pessimists, lead by Roubini, argue that in fact most indicators remain strongly negative in Europe and Japan, near negative in the U.S. and China, and even these upticks in the U.S and China were temporary.
1. THE U.S.
The Empire State and Philly Fed index of manufacturing are still plummeting, initial claims for unemployment benefits are rising and suggest accelerating job losses; the sales increase in January is an aberrational rebound fueled by bargain hunters from a depressed December.
Despite a slight recent improvement in the ISM index, the latest data that have come out - industrial production and Empire State economic conditions index - have been as depressing as any and suggest that the March ISM may show another sharp dip:
· Industrial production was down 1.4% in February after a revised -1.9% in January.
· Capacity utilization down to 70.9%, the lowest level ever recorded. And the Empire State report on economic condition fell to -38.2, the lowest level ever recorded (data from 2001 on), from -34.7 in February.
Thus, the belief that some economic indicators are showing a bottoming out of the rate of contraction is just not justified by the data.
U.S. domestic consumption, a major part of its GNP, needs to fall further as households increase savings to compensate for their loss in net worth from massive declines in housing prices (25% and another 20% likely) and stock prices (50% so far, more likely). Continuing rising unemployment will compound the decline in consumer demand.
2. CHINA
In China, credit growth was not used for investing in future growth but rather for investing in higher returning deposits. Chinese imports, mostly of raw and intermediate materials used for exports, are down 40%, falling faster than exports. Thus while Chinese exports have up to now fallen less than the rest of Asia, these free falling import figures suggest exports will soon power dive as well.
Elsewhere in Asia, Japan, Taiwan, and Korea’s exports are down 40%-50%. Per Roubini (in his March 16 article at www.rgemonitor.com : Dr. Roubini writes:
“The scale and speed of synchronized global economic contraction is really unprecedented (at least since the Great Depression) with a free fall of GDP, income, consumption, industrial production, employment, exports, imports, residential investment and, more ominously, capex spending around the world. And now many emerging market economies – as argued here for a while- are on the verge of a fully fledged financial crisis starting with Emerging Europe”.
B. The Effectiveness of Government Stimulus Programs
The optimists argue that policy stimulus, both monetary but especially fiscal, in the US, China and the rest of the world is starting to kick in and will contribute to the recovery in late 09. Dr. Roubini and others counter with the following.
1. THE U.S.
In the U.S., monetary easing is ineffective (“like pushing a string”) when there is too much productive capacity for the available demand. Cash strapped and nervous households and businesses don’t spend just because borrowing is cheaper.
Fiscal stimulus (i.e. government spending) will have limited effect. In the U.S., only about 25% of the $800 billion will be deployed in 09, the rest in the coming years. Half of that $200 billion is in the form of tax cuts that are more likely to be saved by anxious household. For example, only 30% of the 2008 tax cuts were spent, the rest saved. Dr. Roubini concludes in the above mentioned article,
“Thus, given the collapse of five out of six components of aggregate demand in the U.S. (consumption, residential investment, capex spending of the corporate sector, business inventories and exports) the stimulus from government spending will be puny this year.”
2. CHINA
The picture in China isn’t any more encouraging. China’s much heralded $480 billion spending will not be effective in the long run. China’s economy is extremely dependent on trade as opposed to domestic consumption. With exports plummeting, thousands of firms closing and millions of jobs lost, domestic consumption will not compensate for declining exports. While government infrastructure spending will be helpful in the long term, any near term spending on more export production capacity while there is already excess capacity may just lead to increasing loan defaults. Moreover, because most of this spending will be capital rather than labor intensive, unemployment and thus domestic consumption will remain a problem.
Thus without recovery of demand from the West, China will not recover.
C. The U.S. Financial System
The optimists claim and financial stocks are oversold, many major institutions say they’ll be profitable in 09, don’t need help, the financial system is solvent. The pessimists, I paraphrase much of Roubini here, paint a starkly different picture.
First, these ‘profits’ are only with the Fed and Treasury heavily subsidizing the financial sector. The Fed Funds - at 0%, with massive quantitative easing, with credit easing allowing banks to dump toxic assets on the Fed balance sheet and with a new government program that allowed banks to borrow at riskless rates almost $200 billion dollars at medium term maturities
Second, the latest version of the TALF now allows even hedge funds to borrow – up to a trillion dollars - at government rates – and leverage their investments 20 times to purchases new ABS issued by banks and reap a nice spread over LIBOR with very limited risk. With policy and borrowing rates equal to zero or close to zero for banks and broker dealers their intermediation margins are obviously positive as lending rates are much higher. But this is a direct huge subsidy of the financial institutions that is being paid by savers that are now earning 0% or close to 0% on $10 trillion of bank deposits.
Third, even with this massive subsidy, the government has allowed the banks vastly understate their write downs and bad debts. How? Via government regulators allowing over-valuation of bad assets, parking illiquid assets in level 3 “unrealistic” valuations, easing of capital requirements, using AIG to bail out its counterparties to the tune of $160 billion, and eventually, suspension of mark to market accounting.
So no surprise that Citibank, Bank of America and JP Morgan can argue that they will be making this year a profit “before provisions for write downs”. There’s the rub: while operational margins can be positive if you borrow at 0% and lend at much higher rates, the actual P&L and balance sheet of banks and broker dealers depends also on write downs. These write downs, delinquencies and write-offs are growing and spreading as the recession worsens.
In sum, without the above forms of assistance, most of the banks would already be gone, and as is are de facto wards of the government. The government is already the biggest shareholder of Citibank, and many others survive purely on government life support.
Dare we say it? Nationalization has at least partially arrived already.
D. The U.S. Stock Market
The optimists say that stock markets have already fallen in the US and globally by over 50% and are now way oversold. Earnings have fallen a lot but will recover soon as economic activity will soon stabilize. And since stock markets are forward looking and bottom out 6 to 9 months before the end of the recession we must be now at the bottom if the economy will recover at latest by year end. The pessimists counter as follows.
Earnings per share (EPS) for the S&P 500 are widely expected to be between $40-60 per share. Then, the question is what the P/E will be on such earnings. In past severe recessions, it could fall to 10-12. Thus in a best case scenario of $60 EPS and P/E of 12 puts the S&P at 720 as a ceiling, and a worst case scenario of $40 EPS and P/E of 10 at 400 – as much as another 50% drop, though even Roubini seems to see this as unlikely, with 500 the more likely floor. With the S&P currently around 760, there’s at best some additional downside, possibly much more.
Roubini has also noted that the generalization that the stock market looks ahead six to nine months is merely that, a generalization. The last recession bottomed in late 2008, GDP growth was solid in 2002, yet the U.S. stock market kept declining until the beginning of 2003. Thus in the last recession the market actually lagged the recovery by 18 months. Thus even if the economy bottoms in 2009-10, the markets could stay down into 2011-12.
E. Ramifications for High Dividend Stock Investors
In sum, we’re still in a near term trading range, with the overall trend continuing down. Continue to invest only with funds allocated for longer term investment that you don’t need for the next six to eighteen months at least. What you buy now may well go lower. Buy only at strong support levels recommended below.
1. Consider a Partial Hedge with Selected Ultrashort ETFs
See Part 4 and 5 for details. For now, however, consider taking partial positions in the following.
· UltraShort S & P 500 Proshares (SDS) – Buy under $75, Strong Buy under $65
· UltraShort Financials ProShares (SKF) -- Buy Under $141; Strong Buy below $125
· UltraShort QQQ ProShares (QID) – Buy Under $55, Strong Buy under $50
· UltraShort Real Estate ProShares (SRS) – Buy Under $58, Strong Buy under $48
· UltraShort Russell2000 ProShares (TWM) – Buy Under $75, Strong Buy under $65
NB: Over the past weeks as the market broke to new lows, a number of readers said my buy levels were too conservative i.e. at such low prices they were unlikely to be hit. The brief rally over the past week has brought many of these already quite close. Again, these move at twice the rate of the index they short, so when the market is volatile, these can get positively hyperactive.
2. Continue to Take Partial Positions at Our Recommended Strong Support Levels
Beyond the Ultrashort ETFs if you can earn reliable dividends from 8-12 percent or more while you wait for recovery, ongoing investment makes sense.
That’s my focus at http://highdividendstocksguide.blogspot.com .
3. Use Sell Stops?
While our emphasis is buy and hold as long as the distribution is safe and fundamentals hold steady, some may want to hedge their bets, especially if they may need the cash within the next year or so. Those in that position should consider using sell stops around 15% below the Strong Buy price as partial principle protection, though you risk getting knocked out of your positions, only to see them come back soon and possibly rise higher while you miss the dividend. It’s a judgment call, though not a bad one for at least some of your holdings given the current pessimism (which of course can change, fast).
Again, our focus is on getting high yields from healthy businesses whose price will recover while we earn outsized returns. Ultrashorts are a bet on near term market direction, and we don’t try to time the market too much, since very few are successful at it.
3. CONCLUSION
Despite the rally, we believe the downtrend remains in place.
Now let’s proceed to Part 6B, and look at what was once a classic haven for high dividend investors – the shipping sector.
No comments:
Post a Comment